How many people came in, and at what times.
The gate count, by day and by hour. Put it next to the timesheet you received, and the gap is no longer a suspicion — it’s a figure you can raise at sign-off.
On a construction site, the number the money depends on is worker-days. It comes from the subcontractor’s timesheet and is taken on trust, because nobody stands at the gate with a notepad. Using your existing cameras, we count how many people come in and at what times, show the zones where people work without a hard hat or vest, and the time of the first and last movement on site. No new hardware. Facial recognition for the employees you register, with their knowledge; everyone else stays a silhouette.
General contractors, developers, project owners with several sitesBetween those two figures sits the subcontractor’s margin. You won’t find it in a spreadsheet, because the spreadsheet is made by the party doing the billing. It only shows at the gate, and the gate is already on camera at almost every site.
The gate count, by day and by hour. Put it next to the timesheet you received, and the gap is no longer a suspicion — it’s a figure you can raise at sign-off.
Hard hats and vests are large patches of color, so they’re easy to see from a distance. The report gives the zone and the hour, not names: “in the concrete pouring zone, between 9 and 11, six entries without a hard hat.” Enough for a safety briefing, without pointing fingers.
The time of the first and last movement on site, by day. Plus the zones nobody passed through: either stalled work fronts or machinery sitting idle.
On construction sites, the first question we get is whether the system can show what each person is doing. The answer is yes, for the employees you register. But individual monitoring falls under Law No. 195/2024, under a strict regime: a documented legal basis, a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), informing every employee — and the employee’s consent is not a valid basis, because employees are in a subordinate position, so the basis has to be built on legitimate interest or on occupational safety obligations. We provide the tool and the documentation; the role of data controller and the responsibility remain yours. Tell us in the first conversation whether you’re going with named tracking, so we can prepare the right paperwork.
The dashboard layout, as it looks in an installation. Switch sites and go through Dashboard, Alerts, Analytics and Reports. The figures are illustrative; in an installation they come from the cameras on site.
On a construction site, the decision that matters is made the same day: how many workers you confirm at sign-off, which work front is empty, where to send the safety briefing. The app is for that moment.
Our first real installations, in production, are in pharmacies in Moldova, where we count daily with a parallel manual check. On construction sites the metric is different: not customers and receipts, but people at the gate, zones and hours. The scenarios below show how to read the data, not what anyone has achieved.
The first location measured daily, with a parallel manual count and an automatic report every evening. The method is the same; on a construction site, all that changes is what we count and where.
The access gate is almost always on camera, for security. If a camera sees the entrance, we have what we need to count. For work fronts we add one or two ordinary cameras.
zero investmentWe mark the entry line, the work zones and the materials area. Machinery and fixed posts are excluded from the count.
one dayImages are processed on the Vizor server; the report gets figures: how many at the gate, how many entries without PPE per zone, the first and last movement. Per-person reports only for registered employees.
data minimizationThe gate count goes next to the timesheet you received, for the same days. That’s where the discussion with the subcontractor starts: with a document, not an impression.
monthlyThe system tracks silhouettes from frame to frame and produces figures by gate, zone and hour. It recognizes the faces of registered employees and can link their tracks, hours and zones to them; for anyone else, it stays at silhouettes and figures. The privacy notice for people entering the site is prepared together, as part of the pilot.
Privacy policy →We start with a single site, for the full length of one construction phase. In the first month we count manually on several days, at hours you choose, and compare the result with what the system produces. If the figures don’t match, we go no further.
We work with your existing security cameras. Where coverage falls short, we add our own.
Installation takes one day and doesn’t stop any work front.
We don’t install access control. We count from the camera that already sees the gate.
We don’t ask for it, because we don’t do that. We measure the gate, zones and hours.
The calculation takes the billed worker-days and the percentage not confirmed at the gate. A mathematical estimate, not a promise: we measure your actual gap during the pilot, and on many sites it is zero.
Calculation: worker-days × unconfirmed percentage × rate × number of sites.
Employee attendance from your existing cameras, with no readers and no cards.
Read →What is allowed, where it is forbidden, what the sign must say and how long footage is kept, under Law 195/2024.
Read →Dock occupancy, blocked aisles and the zones nobody walks into.
Read →Video-based counts you can re-check on the recording: volumes, vehicle mix, peak hour.
Read →Yes, for the employees you register in the system. Each registered person is recognized by face, and their tracks are automatically labeled with their name: entry and exit times, the zones they worked in, entries without PPE. You do the registration, after informing the employee in advance — a facial template is biometric data. People who aren’t registered remain counted silhouettes, with no names.
By path and duration. Someone who comes through the gate, goes to a work front and stays there is counted differently from someone who unloads a truck and leaves within ten minutes. The rules are calibrated to your site in the first month.
If a camera can see the access gate, we have what we need to count. For work fronts and hazard zones, we add one or two ordinary cameras where needed. We don’t install turnstiles and we don’t ask for access cards.
Counting at the gate holds up well, because people pass close to the camera. PPE detection drops in fog or darkness, and that shows in the report: low-visibility intervals are flagged, not reported as zero.
In the first month we count manually on several days, at hours you choose, and put the two results side by side. The measured margin of error is published in the report. If you’re not satisfied, we go no further.
Individual monitoring of employees falls under Law No. 195/2024, in force since August 23, 2026, under a strict regime: a documented legal basis, a data protection impact assessment (DPIA), and informing every employee. Employee consent is not a valid basis, because employees are in a subordinate position: the basis is built on legitimate interest or on occupational safety obligations. We provide the tool and the documentation; the role of data controller and the responsibility remain yours. If you don’t want that regime, leave employees unregistered and stick to aggregate figures by zone and hour.
As a working document: the gate count, by day, next to the billed worker-days. We don’t decide who’s right; we put on the table a measurement both sides can check against the recording.
We don’t ask for an hour-long meeting. You pick a site, we look at the gate and the existing cameras, and we reply within 24 hours, in writing.