The figure has a recording behind it.
If someone challenges the values, the interval is reopened and recounted. Same hour, same footage, same result — or a correction everyone can see.
A traffic study rests on a single figure: how many vehicles and how many pedestrians pass a point, per interval. That figure is usually obtained by two or three operators who stand in the field for a few hours and count by hand. We take it from video recordings: the same intervals, the same methodology, but the count can be redone at any time, on the same footage, by anyone.
No personal data · we count vehicles and pedestrians, not individualsIntersection · one weekday
Illustrative figures. In a real study, the intervals and approaches are set by the design brief.
When a study’s figure supports a permit, a parking lot or an intersection, it ends up being challenged. And if it was obtained with a clicker, there’s nothing to recheck: the operator has left, the day has passed, only the table remains. On video, the count can be redone on the same footage, at any time.
If someone challenges the values, the interval is reopened and recounted. Same hour, same footage, same result — or a correction everyone can see.
An operator tires after a few hours, so short intervals are picked around the assumed peak. A camera keeps going all day, so the real peak isn’t assumed, it’s measured.
Manual counts at different points are usually done on different days, which makes comparing them questionable. With cameras, the points are measured simultaneously.
A traffic study needs no personal data at all: what matters is how many vehicles of each category and how many pedestrians pass through a section, per interval. License plates, faces and identities are not part of the deliverable and aren’t needed for the methodology. This is the only area of our work where Law No. 195/2024 doesn’t come into play at all.
The deliverable is built to go straight into the design report, not to look nice on a screen.
Volumes in fifteen-minute intervals, for each approach and each direction of travel. Table format, ready to go into the appendix.
Cars, light commercial vehicles, trucks, buses, motorcycles, bicycles. Plus pedestrians at the crosswalks in the count section.
The day’s peak interval and the peak hour factor, calculated from all the measured intervals, not from the two hours someone spent in the field.
The intersection diagram with volumes for each movement: through, right, left. The drawing you use when sizing the intersection.
What was measured, when, with what coverage, what was excluded and what the margin of error is. Without it, the figure can’t be verified, and a study that can’t be verified gets challenged.
The footage stays with you for the agreed period. If a challenge comes up, the interval is reopened and recounted.
Together we set the count sections, the days and the hours. The design brief says what needs to be proven; everything starts from there.
one conversationWhere cameras already exist, we use them. Where they don’t, we mount temporary cameras on a pole or tripod for the duration of the count.
one dayAutomatic counting across all intervals, with a manual check on a sample: a few intervals recounted by a person, so the real margin of error is visible.
sample checkThe table, the flow diagram, the methodology note and the recording. If the design engineer asks for a different interval breakdown, it’s rebuilt from the same data.
no re-measurementWe don’t promise absolute accuracy, and we don’t believe vendors who promise it. At our reference installation we count daily with a parallel manual check, and the measured margin of error is published, not hidden. For a study, the margin of error goes into the methodology note.
Worker-days at the gate vs. the billed timesheet, hard hats by zone, the first movement of the day.
Read →Infrared beam, 3D sensor or your existing cameras: what each one measures and what it costs.
Read →Installed in one day, then everything remotely: receipts from 1C, reports in Romanian and Russian.
Read →Dock occupancy, blocked aisles and the zones nobody walks into.
Read →The count table in fifteen-minute intervals, by approach and direction; the vehicle mix by vehicle category; pedestrians in the section; the peak hour and peak hour factor; the flow diagram; the methodology note; and the recording, for the agreed period.
It can be redone. A manual count can no longer be checked: the operator has left, the day has passed, only the table remains. On video, if someone challenges an interval, it is reopened and recounted on the same footage.
No. We don’t read license plates and we don’t identify people. The deliverable contains volumes by category and interval. This is the only area of our work where personal data isn’t an issue at all.
The temporary cameras run on batteries for typical counting periods. If the point is on public land, we obtain the placement permit together; it’s usually requested by the design engineer, not by us.
It depends on how many points and how many days the design brief calls for. Setup takes a day, the count runs as long as you’ve set, and the deliverable arrives within a few days of the count ending.
We don’t guarantee absolute accuracy, and we don’t believe vendors who do. We manually check a sample of intervals, and the measured margin of error goes into the methodology note. A study without a methodology note can’t be defended when challenged.
We don’t ask for an hour-long meeting. You tell us the points, days and intervals the design brief requires, and we reply within 24 hours, in writing.